Pros and Cons Essay Example for Free

Pros and Cons Essay1) thermo thermonuclear power generation does emit relatively low amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2). The emissions of green house gases and therefore the region of nuclear power plants to global warming is therefore relatively little. Between mining the uranium, refining and enriching fuel, and lastly to building and operating the plant, a big 1,250 250-megawatt nuclear facility wee-wees an estimated 250,000 tons of carbon dioxide during its lifetime. In contrast, coal-fired plants produce close to 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year in the U. S. alone period also emitting lots of other pollution soot that causes lung diseases sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides that cause smog and loony toons rain and mercury that contaminates fish. In fact, coal kills 4000 times as many people as nuclear power, according to one analysis.2) It is possible to generate a high amount of electrical null in one single plant.3) This technology is readily available.Disadv antages1) Uranium Waste- The chief danger lies with the mining waste it contains radium, which is passing radioactive. Radon gas (one of the products that occur after radium undergoes radioactive decay) can expose workers and nearby and nearby communities to an array of health risks like lung cancer, bone cancer and lymphoma.2) The energy source for nuclear energy is Uranium, which is a scarce resource. Its supply is estimated to last only for the next 30 to 60 years depending on the actual demand.3) Nuclear power plants as well as nuclear waste could be like targets for terrorist attacks.4) Risk of Catastrophe- Fukushima has joined Three Mile Island and Chernobyl in the vocabulary of dangerous nuclear mishaps. The explosion at Chernobyls nuclear plant in the Ukraine showed how nuclear energy could just as easily set aside us as it nurtures our everyday needs.While nuclear power would allow Singapore to achieve energy self sufficiency, the risks and