Modern Audience Essay

It is unrealizable for a youthful audience to feel cozy with the Taming of The termagant with close reference to Shakespe bes intro of Katharina, nonsensical conventions and having the above question in mind, write about your response to the close discomfit of the flowIn my opinion, The Taming of The Shrew tells the fiction of an inglorious marriage and I would admit with the view that it is out(predicate) for a young audience to feel comfortable with the play, strangely the conclusion of the story. Shakespe bes presentation of Katharina at the finish of the play try outms to me to be match slight of a broken person she is intimately robotic in her obedience and without spirit, except for when sing the praises of wifely submission. Thy husband is thy Lord, thy life, thy keeper, thy head, thy s overeign is a prime example of the disturbing brainwash Petruchio has carried out on her. This humbled Kate is a far cry from the feisty Katharina we ar first greeted by in telephvirtuoso number 2, where she ex reassigns a vicious battle of address with Petruchio Asses atomic number 18 made to bear and so argon you.This devise in itself shows that she is fearless, and defies her unions conventions, cursing at str tempers a sad contrast to the plays stoping, where she has tot totallyy conformed to whats expected of her. The ending of the play too contains truly little buffo onery, with the exception of the melodic phrase as to who is the real Vincentio, and the fight in the midst of Kate and the Widow. This is beca uptake the Taming of the shrew defies around Shakespearian comedy conventions, as the marriage takes place halfway the play, rather than at hence end as was traditional. I believe that this adds to the vexation of the advanced audience, as after the vatical happy ending we are approach with the harsh reality of Petruchios intercession of Kate.Shakespeare presents Katharina as completely changed by the end of the play. At first she is wild and ostensibly untameable we get together her tie up her child and argue violently with both Petruchio and her fetch. So may you lose you mail, if you strike me, you are no gentleman, and if no gentleman, why so no arms Here, Shakespeare presents Katharina as super skilled with word manipulation, generating humour with her haughty play on words with arms as she brands Petruchio only when a common if he would strike her.This is in staring(a) contrast to the ending of the play where she seems to go through no free will. She is practically enslaved to Petruchio, agreeing with his all(prenominal) thought and whim. An example of this is make a motion 4, survey 5, Petruchio and Kate see Vincentio and Petruchio refers to him as a pleasure ground and lambly maid, instructing Kate to stuff her for her mantraps sake. Shakespeares use of a command word clear shows Petruchios major power and utter understand in their relationship. Vincentio is obviously a man, but despite this, and despite a model from Hortensio that this pretence will anger Vincentio, a will authorise the man mad, to make a woman of him, Kate does indeed embrace him for his beautys sake green budding virgin, fair fresh and enjoyable.This elaborate language with its piling up of adjectives is an example of hyperbole used for comic effect. It is perhaps also, on a less humorous none, an instance of what many feminists would see as the darker side of The Taming of the Shrew, and the destruction of Katherinas personality this is a strong rendition as she could be seen to be using this elaborate language payable to her desperation to please Petruchio or her fear of punishment. Petruchio encourage exerts his power over Kate by then changing his mind and accusing Kate of madness.I hope thou art not mad, this is a man she readily agrees, ignoring the feature that Petruchio has undermined and humiliated her, and begs for his pardon over her stupidity. This word picture is a prime example of the change Petruchio has caused from Katharina to Kate. She is not the character we met in act upon 2, and this transformation could be said to be self-conscious for a advanced(a) audience to watch. It is unpleasant to see one tender being so completely at the hands of another, and whether this total obedience is due to love, fear or desperation is down to the audience to decide. I think this adds a more disquieting edge to the play as Shakespeare seems to condone Petruchios taming, or what more or less modern audiences would see as abuse.However, both(prenominal) critics, for instance Lucy Bailey, director for the RSC, bring stated that the play is a curiously misunderstood love story, not the abusive tale of misogyny some modern audiences would see it as Bailey says that Petruchio and Kates loss leader is instant, and that what follows after their first meeting is simply fore-play. Nonetheless, this interpretation is hard to digest in the fac e of the cruelty Petruchio inflicts on Kate, why would a man in love treat the object of his affections corresponding one of his farm animals? This treatment is particularly shown during Act 4 where Petruchio begins his taming, he attempts to train Kate as one would train a dog. EXAMPLE. gauge language. Other critics deport explained this treatment by saying that Petruchio is driven mad by grief after the death of his father he takes out his disaffection and anger on other people closely as an experiment. (Director David Farr)The best example of Shakespeares changing presentation of Katharina to Kate privy be seen in the final scene, in her speech. She has not spoken for several pages, but then, on Petruchios command, launches into the longest speech in the entire play, expelling the virtues of being a good wife. The first reason that most modern audiences would find this scene uncomfortable to watch is the way that Petruchio instructs Kate to Tell these determined women what duty they do owe to their Lords and husbands.This phrase itself could be seen to be problematic for modern audiences to digest. In the 21st century, men and women are equal, so the way that Petruchio refers to men as Lords, implies a power and control over women that is uncomfortable for most modern audiences to hear. Shakespeare modishly prioritises the word Lord over economize in this line emphasising the debt Petruchio feels women owe their husbands, like peasants owe their Lords. In this statement, Petruchio also uses wilful as an insult, whereas in modern Britain, although it can have negative connotations, headstrong is a good deal a positive personality attribute, implying one knows ones own mind.The ending of The Taming of the Shrew contains very little comic elements, m akin(predicate)g it all the more uncomfortable. There is the scene in which Vincentio encounters the pedant impersonating himself .The audience has not seen Kate as impassioned during her speech since sh e was Katharina we see some of her old spark when she refers to Bianca and The Widow as froward and unable worms. However, this insult could be seen as a sad chiding of how Petruchio has twisted her feisty nature to movement his own needs. Most modern spectators would see the entire speech as improbably anti-feminist, and I believe that due to this it is impossible for most modern audiences to feel comfortable with The Taming of The Shrew. Kate suggests women should kneel for peace and place your hands below your husbands pedestal. These phrases evoke feelings of servitude and to most modern audiences are difficult to hear. Kates realisation that women are weak, their lances nothing but straws contrasts to her physical military unit at the start of the play where she attacks Petruchio. That Ill try (she strikes him).Shakespeare uses regal imagery in this speech to show the total crushed leather and obedience Kate feels towards Petruchio. She refers to husbands and Lords, Sover eigns, Heads and Princes, and these words show the power Petruchio has over Kate and the power she believes all husbands should have over their wives one of absolute control, akin to the monarch. Shakespeares effective listing of these nouns emphasises Kates uncanny passion towards Petruchio and wifely obedience. Similes are also widely used in Kates final speech for example, to scare away a scornful glance at ones husband blots thy beauty as frosts do bite the meads. Kate now believes that obedience is beauty, and for most modern audiences who live in a society where independence is valued and celebrated, it is impossible to feel comfortable with these ideas.